Case No. 2011-1882 State of Ohio v. Clarence D. Roberts

 

Date

09-25-2012

Duration

00:38:56

Download

Download File : 360p
 
 
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
Width : px Height : px
Code :
 Facebook Embed : To embed this video into your Facebook page, copy and paste the above URL into Facebook's 'Link' box in its 'Share' options.
Please Note : End points and dimensions are not recognized by Facebook.
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
URL :
 
Does 2010 Law Require Police, Crime Labs to Preserve Biological Evidence from Pre-2010 Court Cases?

Or Does New Law Apply Only to Evidence Collected After It Was Enacted?

State of Ohio v. Clarence D. Roberts , Case no. 2011-1882
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Guernsey County)

ISSUE: Section 2933.82 of the Ohio Revised Code, which was enacted by the General Assembly in 2010 and became effective on July 6 of that year, requires that Ohio law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, courts and crime laboratories that obtain biological evidence while investigating specified crimes including murder and rape must preserve that evidence for a specified period of time beyond the trial of a defendant charged with those crimes. The statute also requires that, on request, governmental entities that possess biological evidence from a criminal case must provide the defendant with an inventory of all such evidence in their possession.
 
 
TimeTitle
00:01:10Kristopher Haines for Clarence Roberts
00:11:26Daniel Padden for the state
00:30:56Summation: Kristopher Haines for Clarence Roberts