Case No. 2011-1740 James A. Lang [et al.] v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services

 

Date

06-05-2012

Duration

00:36:51

Download

Download File : 360p
 
 
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
Width : px Height : px
Code :
 Facebook Embed : To embed this video into your Facebook page, copy and paste the above URL into Facebook's 'Link' box in its 'Share' options.
Please Note : End points and dimensions are not recognized by Facebook.
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
URL :
 
Must Court Follow Agency Guidance Letter In Ruling on Workers' Eligibility for Federal Wage Supplement Program?

Where Court Finds Non-Statutory Guideline Conflicts With Statutory Language

James A. Lang [et al.] v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Case no. 2011-1740
Third District Court of Appeals (Seneca County)

ISSUE: When the state government agency that administers a federal program in Ohio is sued in state court by an Ohio applicant who was denied benefits under that program, may the court decide the case by analyzing the applicable federal law under established rules of statutory interpretation, or must the court follow an informal guidance letter from the federal agency that administers the program nationally despite the court’s finding that the guidance letter conflicts with the plain language of the statute?
 
 
TimeTitle
00:00:33Michael Hendershot for ODJFS
00:16:02Kenneth Kowalski for James Lang et al.
00:34:19Summation: Michael Hendershot for ODJFS